64 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
# Capability Map
|
||
|
||
Status: **approved Phase 0 baseline**
|
||
Implementation authorization: **not granted**
|
||
|
||
## Product intent
|
||
|
||
Build a production-shaped, Persian-first merchant analytics panel that turns payment-attempt data into accurate, traceable, numerical, and actionable insights. Each merchant can sign in with a dedicated username and password, see only its own detailed data, and compare itself with anonymized category/cohort aggregates.
|
||
|
||
The hackathon demo will seed one account per merchant. Where merchant profile fields are absent from the source dataset, clearly synthetic display data may be generated for presentation; synthetic values must never be represented as source facts.
|
||
|
||
## Capabilities and dependency order
|
||
|
||
| Order | Capability | Responsibility | Depends on | MVP |
|
||
|---:|---|---|---|:---:|
|
||
| 1 | Data foundation | PostgreSQL model, one-time CSV bootstrap, provenance, validation, quality reporting, synthetic merchant profiles; future source writes are owned by ZarinPal | — | Yes |
|
||
| 2 | Identity and access | Merchant credentials, sessions, tenant isolation, demo account seeding | Data foundation | Yes |
|
||
| 3 | Analytics engine | Deterministic metrics, cohorts, trends, diagnostic drill-downs, bounded parallel on-demand section jobs, 30-day Redis cache, PostgreSQL revision invalidation | Data foundation | Yes |
|
||
| 4 | Merchant API | Stable authenticated interfaces and tenant-scoped SSE for partial analytics delivery | Identity and access, analytics engine | Yes |
|
||
| 5 | Merchant dashboard | Persian RTL dashboard, responsive navigation, accessible charts/tables and explanations | Merchant API | Yes |
|
||
| 6 | AI assistance | AvalAI-backed explanation/recommendation workflow over sanitized aggregates | Analytics engine, merchant API | No |
|
||
| 7 | Platform operations | Compose, Nginx, CI/CD, observability, backup/restore, release and rollback | All deployables | Yes |
|
||
|
||
Build sequence: data foundation → identity and analytics → API → dashboard → platform operations → AI assistance.
|
||
|
||
## Repository boundaries
|
||
|
||
- `zarinpal-analytics-backend`: one Go repository containing the modular backend and independently runnable commands where needed (API, importer, migrations, jobs).
|
||
- `zarinpal-analytics-frontend`: SvelteKit 2, Svelte 5, strict TypeScript, Tailwind CSS v4.
|
||
- `zarinpal-analytics-deployment`: Compose/Nginx/scripts/configuration and orchestration only; service repositories appear as ignored nested checkouts during deployment.
|
||
|
||
## Dataset facts that constrain the design
|
||
|
||
- Source grain: one payment attempt, uniquely identified by `(session_key, try_seq)`.
|
||
- Observed volume: 2,213,289 attempts, 2,062,839 sessions, 343 merchants, 348 terminals, 5 categories.
|
||
- Observed period: 2026-01-01 through 2026-07-01.
|
||
- Nullability is material: response, PSP, issuer/card, verification timing, and settlement fields are incomplete.
|
||
- Source `adjusted_fee` is the merchant-fee field for this product and is normalized once per session as a real Rial amount; the challenge source name/value was confidentiality-adjusted.
|
||
- Raw CSV/database state is local operational input, not versioned source.
|
||
|
||
## Cross-cutting invariants
|
||
|
||
1. Tenant isolation is enforced server-side on every merchant-scoped operation.
|
||
2. Cross-merchant output is aggregate and anonymized; no row-level peer data is exposed. Peer benchmarks use other merchants in the active merchant's category for the same selected period, exclude the active merchant, and require at least 10 peers plus 1,000 combined peer sessions.
|
||
3. Every displayed metric has a definition, source fields, filters, time window, and drill-down path.
|
||
4. Dataset imports are repeatable and produce a versioned manifest with checksum, counts, timestamps, and validation results.
|
||
5. Secrets stay outside Git; examples contain names and safe placeholders only.
|
||
6. AI is post-MVP, receives only minimized/sanitized aggregates, and cannot become the source of record.
|
||
7. External calls have timeouts and bounded retries; jobs are idempotent and observable.
|
||
8. Production changes are reversible and backed by documented health checks and rollback steps.
|
||
9. `Paid` and `Verified` are both successful bank payments; `Paid` still requires merchant verification and `Verified` is finalized. Paid-volume and recovery metrics include both while verification metrics keep them separate.
|
||
10. Merchant fees are real Rial amounts stored/summed once per session; repeated attempt rows never multiply a fee.
|
||
11. MVP reporting periods are limited to daily, Saturday–Friday weekly, Jalali-month, and Persian-season views with consistent `Asia/Tehran` boundaries across database, API, and frontend.
|
||
12. An idempotent start request enqueues overview, payment-performance, fees, and peer-comparison sections for bounded parallel calculation by a separate Go worker; Redis caches each typed section for 30 days under merchant/cohort and metric-definition revisions.
|
||
13. A separate authenticated SSE request exposes each section as it becomes ready. Redis and the on-demand worker remain private, and Redis is never a source of truth or backup target.
|
||
14. Each section attempt is limited to 60 seconds and at most two transient retries with exponential backoff/jitter; deterministic errors fail immediately.
|
||
15. The worker pins pre-1.0 Asynq `v0.26.0`, runs at 16 jobs globally and 4/merchant by default, and changes require reviewed dependency/load evidence.
|
||
16. Start, manual-retry, and SSE limits use independent authenticated-user/merchant buckets and return `429` with `Retry-After` before work is queued. SSE heartbeats run every 15 seconds and authorized run-event replay lasts one hour.
|
||
17. Peer outputs use the median of one independently calculated value per eligible merchant plus a direction-aware merchant performance percentile. Equal merchant weighting is intentional because transaction weighting would let the dataset's largest merchants dominate the benchmark.
|
||
|
||
## Required capability specs
|
||
|
||
Each capability spec must define objective, scope/non-scope, actors, functional requirements, data/API contracts, security and privacy requirements, failure behavior, observability, tests, acceptance criteria, migration/rollback considerations, and unresolved decisions. A capability may enter implementation only after its spec status is marked **Approved**.
|